THE CASE OF THE APOTHECARIES.

[]

TO prevent the Miſchiefs ariſing from Ignorance, or Temerity in the Adminiſtration of Medicines, King Henry the VIIIth, by his Charter eſtabliſhed the COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, excluding all Perſons, who ſhould not be liſenced by them, from the Practice of Phyſick within London, and ſeven Miles thereof: Which Charter was ſoon afterwards confirmed by Parliament, and the ſaid Excluſion from Practice extended all over England.

And to prevent the like Miſchiefs in the Preparation of Medicines, the ſaid College were by ſubſequent Acts directed to elect, yearly, Four of their Fellows, who, after taking an Oath of Office, were impowered (with the Aſſiſtance of the Wardens of the Company of Grocers and Apothecaries) to viſit all Apothecaries Houſes within London only, and to deſtroy ſuch Drugs and Medicines as they ſhould find defective; which Power of Viſitation was afterwards, by a Charter of King James the Iſt, extended to the Diſtance of ſeven Miles round London.

BUT the Exerciſe of this laſt Power being limitted to four Perſons, the ſame appeared to Sir Theodore De Mayerne, and Henry Atkins, Phyſicians to King James the Iſt (and who, being the then moſt illuſtrious Members of the College, may be ſuppoſed to declare the Senſe of the whole Body) ſo very inſufficient for ſuppreſſing the variety of Abuſes intended to be remedied, that at their Deſire, and for the more effectually preventing thoſe Abuſes, the ſaid King very ſoon after, by another Charter, formed the Apothecaries of London into a diſtinct Society, with the like Powers of Viſitation, and expreſsly prohibited all Perſons from exerciſing the Buſineſs of an Apothecary within ſeven Miles of London, unleſs firſt examined, approved, and licenſed by the ſaid Society.

TRUE it is that the Validity of the ſaid Charter being doubtful, and the Extent of the Powers thereby granted uncertain, and there being no Proviſion for rectifying any Abuſe of thoſe Powers, the ſaid Society have ever been very cautious in the Exerciſe thereof, and of late Years eſpecially, have kept up the Form only of a Viſitation: Whence it has happened, that ſeveral ignorant, and illiterate Perſons have been encouraged to enter upon the Buſineſs of an Apothecary, whilſt others, of perhaps a more regular Education, and better Knowledge, have in order to engroſs the Trade, by under-ſelling the fair Apothecary, ventured to compound their Medicines of damaged, ſtale, and counterfeit Ingredients; ſo that upon the whole, great Quantities of pernicious Medicines have been ſold in the Neighbourhood of London, and tranſmitted into all Parts of the Kingdom.

THESE Practices being notorious, the College in 1722, procured the Act of Parliament (now propoſed to be revived) to eſtabliſh their Power of Viſitation agreeable to their Charter. But a Clauſe having, upon their Attempt to obtain a Bill for reviving the ſaid Act in 1729, been added by a Committee of the Houſe of Commons [for granting an Appeal from the Judgment of the Cenſors to ſix Phyſicians and ſix Apothecaries to be determined upon Oath, and in Caſe of Equality of Voices, by the Opinion of the Preſident or Vice-Preſident of the College] the ſaid Bill was drop'd, and the College have not ſince thought proper to apply for any Bill of that kind, notwithſtanding the Continuance and daily Increaſe of the bad Practices above-mentioned.

AT length ſeveral Apothecaries, [whoſe Profeſſion affords them but too frequent Opportunities of obſerving the Extent and miſchievous Effects of thoſe bad Practices,] thought it their Duty, as well in Regard to the Publick, as themſelves, to repreſent the ſame to the LEGISLATURE.

[2]

IN Conſequence of this Application, the Houſe of Commons have been pleaſed to order in a Bill, to revive, explain, and amend the ſaid Act paſſed in 1722. From which Order the ſaid Petitioners conceive that honourable Houſe was ſatisfied of the Inſufficiency of a mere Revival of the ſaid Act, and therefore they ſubmit the following Amendments or Alterations, as what they humbly apprehend will render the ſaid Act moſt effectual on the one Hand, and prevent any Abuſe of the Powers thereby granted on the other, Viz.

THESE Amendments, the Petitioners humbly conceive, will appear to be proper, and neceſ [...]ary, for the following Reaſons, viz.

THAT the four Cenſor [...] who muſt be preſumed to be, as the Law requires, the beſt learned, [...]eſt, and moſt [...] of their Profeſſion, and conſequently moſt employed,) cannot ſpare ſufficient Leiſure to attend the Viſitation, ſo diligently, and frequently as they ought, without great Loſs to themſelves, and to the Publick, who may want their Aſſiſtance in another Way.

THAT their Number, even if they were to give their utmoſt Attention, and dedicate their whole Time to this Duty, would not be ſufficient to viſit all Apothecaries Shops within London, and ſeven Miles thereof, which upon a fair Computation, will appear to be upwards of a Thouſand.

THAT the original Juriſdiction, and the Determination on the Appeal ought not to be in the ſame Body, the Members of which may be ſuppoſed tender of each other's Reputation, and the general Character of their Community.

THAT neither the Cenſors in the [...] Inſtance, nor the Preſident, and Fellows upon the Appeal, are by the ſaid Act put under the Reſtriction of any particular Oath.

THAT by the ſaid Act no Proviſion is made for preventing Perſons from entering upon the Buſineſs of Pharmacy who have not been properly inſtructed therein, and [3]who conſequently require a much ſtricter and more frequent Viſitation than any reaſonable Number of Viſitors can poſſibly attend.

THAT the only Puniſhment provided by the ſaid Act for keeping any adulterated, or pernicious Medicine for Sale, is the deſtroying it, which in moſt Inſtances (as Medicines are principally adulterated for the ſake of ſaving the expenſive Ingredients) is a very trifling Puniſhment, by no Means adequate to the Offence.

THESE Alterations in the Act (it is humbly conceived) will anſwer all the ſalutary Intentions of the honourable Houſe of Commons, and yet preſerve to the Society of Apothecaries, the Privileges granted to them by their Charter; Privileges! ſo far from being unreaſonable in their own Nature, that Parliament has thought proper to grant, or confirm the like to the College of Phyſicians, and Company of Surgeons; and that, without any of thoſe Guards againſt the Abuſe of Power, which the Petitioners propoſe, and deſire may be provided in their Caſe; nor can the ſaid College, and Company but approve, in the Society of Apothecaries, a Conſtitution which, in their own reſpective Bodies, they have, by long Experience, found to be highly beneficial to the Publick.

WITH reſpect to the College, it is true the Power of Viſitation, which has hitherto been exerciſed by their Cenſors, and the Wardens of the Society of Apothecaries in Conjunction, is by theſe Alterations propoſed to be wholly veſted in ſworn Examiners of the ſaid Society. But then in lieu thereof, the ſaid College are intended to be veſted with a ſuperior Juriſdiction, and Controul, which the Petitioners humbly conceive is more ſuitable, not only to the Convenience, but Dignity of that learned Body; and from the above-mentioned Teſtimony of Sir Theodore de Mayerne and Dr. Atkins, as well as from the Nature of the Thing itſelf, it appears that the Apothecaries are very properly qualified for the Viſitation hereby propoſed to be entruſted with them.

As to the Perſons who will be immediately affected by the Examination intended by theſe Amendments,—It is ſubmitted whether it can be thought an Hardſhip to oblige thoſe who will engage in a Profeſſion, of ſo much Conſequence to the Publick, to give a Teſt of their Ability and Fitneſs for it; and as they will become intituled to ſeveral of the Privileges, without being ſubject to the many burthenſome and expenſive Offices of the ſaid Society, it is but reaſonable that they ſhould contribute ſomething towards defraying the additional Expences which theſe new Duties will occaſion.

THE Application of the yearly Sum of ſix Shillings (it is likewiſe hoped) will be thought ſo very uſeful to the Publick, that no Objection can be made to ſo trifling a Demand.

THE ſaid Society do (at an Expence too great for their preſent Circumſtances) endeavour to maintain a Botanical Garden, which the Munificence of that great Patron of natural and uſeful Knowledge, Sir Hans Sloane, has enabled them to eſtabliſh: A Matter in ſeveral foreign Cities, thought worthy of the Publick Care. At this Garden, (at preſent furniſhed with as great a Number of Plants as perhaps any in Europe) a Demonſtrator is appointed by the Society, to inſtruct their Members, and Pupils in this neceſſary Branch of Pharmacy, and to ſuperintend, at proper Times, Herborizations in the Neighbourhood of London; of all which Advantages the ſaid Licentiates and their Apprentices will be entitled to partake.

UPON the whole, the Petitioners humbly hope the Publick will, by theſe Propoſals, be ſatisfied that they have no unreaſonable Views of enriching the Society, of which they are Members, or of procuring any particular Advantage to themſelves; their ſole Intention, in offering to take this Burthen upon them, being that they may contribute as much as in them lies to the preventing Frauds in their Profeſſion. And as a Proof that they have no oppreſſive Views, they decline no Appeal to any Juriſdiction the Legiſlature ſhall think proper, not deſiring to be truſted with a Power over others, which they would be ſorry to ſee granted to any, over themſelves: neither do they wiſh for more than a temporary Probation of their Scheme, that ſo, if it ſhall be found hurtful or ineffectual, it may not be intailed upon Poſterity.

Appendix A

[]

THE CASE OF THE APOTHECARIES.

Distributed by the University of Oxford under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License